Who is a Related Party and Who is a Relative?
Companies Act, 2013 — Section 2(76) & 2(77)
Who is a Related Party? — Section 2(76)
- A
director or his relative.
- A Key
Managerial Personnel (KMP) or his relative.
- A firm
where a director, manager, or his relative is a partner.
- A
private company where a director, manager, or his relative is a member or
director.
- A
public company where a director or manager together with his relatives
holds more than 2% of paid-up share capital.
- Any
body corporate whose Board, MD, or manager acts on the instructions of a
director or manager.
- Any
person on whose instructions a director or manager is accustomed to act.
- A
holding, subsidiary, or associate company; a co-subsidiary; or an
investing company or venturer.
- Any
person prescribed by rules — includes a non-independent director or KMP of
the holding company, or his relative.
Points 6 and 7 do not apply when advice is given in a professional capacity (e.g. a lawyer or auditor).
Who is a Relative? — Section 2(77)
- Members
of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)
- Husband
and wife
- Father
(including step-father)
- Mother
(including step-mother)
- Son
(including step-son)
- Son's
wife
- Daughter
- Daughter's
husband
- Brother
(including step-brother)
- Sister
(including step-sister)
This list is exhaustive. Cousins, uncles, aunts,
grandparents are not covered.
1. Is a director himself a related party?
Yes. A director is directly covered under clause (i).
2. Is an independent director a related party?
Yes, as a director under clause (i). But for clause (ix) —
which covers holding company directors — independent directors are excluded.
3. Is the wife of a director a related party?
Yes. Wife is a relative under Section 2(77), so she is a
related party under clause (i).
4. Is the son of a KMP a related party?
Yes. Son is a relative under Section 2(77), making him a
related party under clause (ii).
5. Is a cousin of a director a related party?
No. Cousins are not in the prescribed list under Section
2(77). Not a relative, not a related party.
6. Is a firm where the director's brother is a partner a
related party?
Yes. Brother is a relative, and clause (iii) covers firms
where a director's relative is a partner.
7. What if a director holds only 1% in a public company?
Add up the director's holding plus all his relatives'
holdings. If the total crosses 2%, that public company is a related party.
8. Is a subsidiary company a related party?
Yes. Clause (viii)(A) directly covers subsidiary companies.
9. Are two subsidiaries of the same holding company
related parties to each other?
Yes. Clause (viii)(B) covers co-subsidiaries — both are
related parties to each other.
10. Is an associate company a related party?
Yes. Associate companies are covered under clause (viii)(A).
11. What is an investing company or venturer?
A body corporate whose investment in the company would
result in the company becoming its associate. That investor is a related party.
12. Does a professional advisor become a related party?
No. The proviso to clauses (vi) and (vii) says advice given
in a professional capacity does not create a related party relationship.
13. Is the CFO of a holding company a related party of
the subsidiary?
Yes. Under clause (ix), a KMP of the holding company is
deemed a related party of the subsidiary.
14. Is the daughter-in-law of a director a relative?
Yes. "Son's wife" is listed in Section 2(77), so
she is a relative and a related party.
15. Is the son-in-law of a director a relative?
Yes. "Daughter's husband" is listed in Section
2(77).
16. Is a step-sister a relative?
Yes. Section 2(77) explicitly includes step-sister within
the definition of "sister."
17. Are HUF members relatives?
Yes. Members of a Hindu Undivided Family are the first
category listed under Section 2(77).
18. Is a private company where the director's sister is a
shareholder a related party?
Yes. Sister is a relative, and clause (iv) covers private
companies where a director's relative is a member.
19. Can a company be a related party to itself?
No. The definition refers to external parties only.
20. Is a promoter who is not a director a related party?
If the board habitually acts on that promoter's
instructions, yes — under clause (vii). Otherwise, not automatically.
21. Is a manager treated the same as a director?
Not the same role, but clauses (iii), (iv), (v), (vi), and
(vii) give managers similar treatment for related party purposes.
22. Is a firm where the director's mother is a partner a
related party?
Yes. Mother is a relative under Section 2(77), and clause
(iii) covers firms where a relative is a partner.
23. Does "relative" include an adopted child?
The Act mentions step-children but not adopted children
expressly. Under Indian personal law, an adopted child has the same status as a
biological child, so they would generally be treated as a relative. Seek legal
advice for specific cases.
24. If a director resigns, does his spouse remain a
related party?
No. Once the person is no longer a director, the related
party connection based on his directorship ends.
25. Is a body corporate whose manager follows a
director's instructions a related party?
Yes. Clause (vi) covers exactly this — any body corporate
whose manager habitually acts on a director's instructions.
26. Is a LLP where the director's father is a designated
partner a related party?
Yes. A LLP is treated as a firm, father is a relative, and
clause (iii) covers firms where a relative is a partner.
27. Is a public company where the director holds exactly
2% a related party?
No. Clause (v) requires more than 2%. Exactly 2% does not
cross the threshold.
28. Is a holding company a related party of its own
subsidiary?
Yes. The relationship works both ways — holding company and
subsidiary are related parties to each other.
29. Is a Company Secretary (CS) a KMP for related party
purposes?
Yes. A CS is defined as a KMP under Section 2(51), so he and
his relatives are related parties under clause (ii).
30. If a director's brother runs a sole proprietorship,
is it a related party?
The brother himself is a related party as a relative under
clause (i). Any transaction with his sole proprietorship is effectively a
transaction with a related party and should be treated as such.
Comments
Post a Comment